Abstract
Existing theories struggle when political engagement is an end in itself. To explain intrinsically motivated engagement in politics, this study synthesizes psychological theories to deduce a need-based theory of political motivation. It posits that intrinsic political motivation has roots in seemingly apolitical processes of need satisfaction that are universal and deeply ingrained in the human psyche. However, in a high-powered survey experiment, 14 of 15 preregistered analytical tests did not yield the expected evidence for the basic tenet that previous need-related experiences with politics affect the quality and quantity of future activities in the political domain. Showcasing a stepwise approach to engage with null results in hypothesis-driven research, post hoc analyses solidify the null findings, which call into question the validity of the presented theory and the previous evidence on which it was built. This study thus enhances our understanding of what does and does not underlie intrinsic motivation for political engagement.
Cite
@article{wuttke_2021,
title={The pleasure principle: Why (some) people develop a taste for politics: Evidence from a preregistered experiment},
volume={40},
DOI={10.1017/pls.2020.18},
number={1},
journal={Politics and the Life Sciences},
publisher={Cambridge University Press},
author={Wuttke, Alexander},
year={2021},
pages={19–39}}