Why Too Many Political Science Findings Cannot be Trusted and What We Can Do About it: A Review of Meta-scientific Research and a Call for Institutional Reform



Open science
Meta science
Review article

Wuttke, A. Why Too Many Political Science Findings Cannot Be Trusted and What We Can Do About It: A Review of Meta-Scientific Research and a Call for Academic Reform. Polit Vierteljahresschr 60, 1–19 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11615-018-0131-7

Authors
Affiliations

University of Bremen

University of Leeds

Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München

Published

November 2018

Doi

Abstract

Witnessing the ongoing “credibility revolutions” in other disciplines, political science should also engage in meta-scientific introspection. Theoretically, this commentary describes why scientists in academia’s current incentive system work against their self-interest if they prioritize research credibility. Empirically, a comprehensive review of meta-scientific research with a focus on quantitative political science demonstrates that threats to the credibility of political science findings are systematic and real. Yet, the review also shows the discipline’s recent progress toward more credible research. The commentary proposes specific institutional changes to better align individual researcher rationality with the collective good of verifiable, robust, and valid scientific results.

Cite

RefWorks

@Article{Wuttke2019,
author={Wuttke, Alexander},
title={Why Too Many Political Science Findings Cannot Be Trusted and What We Can Do About It: A Review of Meta-Scientific Research and a Call for Academic Reform},
journal={Politische Vierteljahresschrift},
year={2019},
month={Mar},
day={01},
volume={60},
number={1},
pages={1-19},
abstract={Witnessing the ongoing ``credibility revolutions'' in other disciplines, political science should also engage in meta-scientific introspection. Theoretically, this commentary describes why scientists in academia's current incentive system work against their self-interest if they prioritize research credibility. Empirically, a comprehensive review of meta-scientific research with a focus on quantitative political science demonstrates that threats to the credibility of political science findings are systematic and real. Yet, the review also shows the discipline's recent progress toward more credible research. The commentary proposes specific institutional changes to better align individual researcher rationality with the collective good of verifiable, robust, and valid scientific results.},
issn={1862-2860},
doi={10.1007/s11615-018-0131-7},
url={https://doi.org/10.1007/s11615-018-0131-7}
}